← All stories

The U.S. just banned new Chinese humanoids — the biggest thing to hit the buy side all year.

July 28, 2026 — The FCC added foreign-made humanoid and quadruped robots to its Covered List, blocking new Chinese models from the equipment authorization they need to be sold in the United States.

July 28, 20265 min readNewsroom
The U.S. just banned new Chinese humanoids — the biggest thing to hit the buy side all year.

On July 28 the Federal Communications Commission added 'advanced robotic devices' — humanoid robots and quadrupeds, the four-legged machines often called robot dogs — to its Covered List, the roster of gear the agency deems too risky to authorize for sale in the United States. The same order swept in internet-connected power inverters. The practical effect is blunt: new foreign-produced robots can no longer receive the FCC equipment authorization that nearly every electronic device needs before it can be legally imported, marketed or sold in the country, so a maker without that authorization has essentially no U.S. market access. FCC Chairman Brendan Carr framed the move as economic as much as defensive, saying the agency would 'continue to do our part to secure America's critical supply chains' and was 'acting in lock step with our national security agencies.' Neither the administration nor the outlets covering the order were coy about the target: the ban largely hits China, which builds the vast majority of the world's humanoid and quadruped robots.

The scope matters more than the headline, so it is worth being precise. The Covered List designation applies to new device models seeking authorization; it does not claw back robots anyone already owns, and it does not stop retailers from continuing to sell or import models that cleared the FCC's authorization process before the order. In other words this is a forward-looking gate, not a recall — a company with an already-authorized quadruped can keep selling it, while a brand-new humanoid it hoped to launch this fall cannot, unless it wins an exemption. The order carves out the federal government entirely, so Washington can keep buying and using these devices, and it opens a 'conditional approval' path in which the Department of War (for robots) and the Department of Homeland Security (for inverters) can clear specific devices found not to pose an unacceptable risk. The legal machinery is worth knowing: under the Secure and Trusted Communications Networks Act the FCC can only update the Covered List at the direction of national security authorities, and the trigger here was a White House-convened interagency body's determination that these products, 'regardless of the nationality of origin,' pose 'unacceptable risks' to U.S. national security or the safety of U.S. persons.

For the humanoid market specifically, this lands on a lopsided board. On the most recent brand-share data, six of the top 10 humanoid makers by shipments are Chinese, together responsible for 87% of all humanoids shipped — led by AgiBot at roughly 5,168 units and Unitree at 4,200, against Figure, Agility and Tesla at about 150 each. Only around 15,000 humanoids shipped worldwide in all of 2025, and China's two largest makers accounted for most of them. The reasoning the government put on paper is unusually physical for a communications regulator: it warned that the networked nature of advanced robots creates 'vulnerabilities and vectors for attacks' and that the machines 'collect data that could be leveraged by malign actors to surveil Americans... or to remotely commandeer the robots.' The timing is pointed — Unitree had just launched commercially in Europe on July 22, its first move into a Western market, with a North American push reportedly next — and Beijing said it would take 'all measures necessary' to defend its companies, ahead of a planned Xi–Trump meeting in Washington in September.

For a U.S. buyer, the honest read is that your shortlist just got shorter and more domestic. If a China-built humanoid was in any active pilot or RFP — a Unitree unit as a research bench, an AgiBot or UBTech platform for a warehouse trial — assume new models are off the table for U.S. deployment until the maker either wins conditional approval or stands up U.S.-authorized hardware, and note that even the government carve-out runs toward federal buyers, not private ones. The flip side is a protected runway for the American field just as it nears volume: 1X is taking orders on NEO, Figure is ramping Figure 03 with Figure 04 behind it, Agility has Digit v4 in market with v5 due in December, and Apptronik is advancing Apollo. Analysts note the shelter cuts both ways — insulating U.S. makers from Chinese price competition may also slow the pace at which they improve. The procurement action item is concrete: if a Chinese platform is anywhere in your sourcing, get written confirmation of its FCC authorization status before you sign, because 'available today' and 'importable next quarter' are now two very different things.

Press coverage & primary sources

External links open in a new tab. TheHumanoidStore is not affiliated with any of the publications or companies cited above.